Dynamics of Rural Society Journal https://drsj.fis.ung.ac.id/DRSJ <p><strong>Dynamics of Rural Society Journal (DRSJ)</strong> is an international open-access scientific journal that uses a double-blind peer-review system and publishes high-quality research that is both relevant and engaging for an international audience. The journal is dedicated to discussing and advancing knowledge on rural society and social transformation, particularly in the Global South. Published by the <a href="https://sosiologi.fis.ung.ac.id/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Department of Sociology</a> at <a href="https://ung.ac.id/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Gorontalo State University, Gorontalo, Indonesia</a>, in collaboration with the <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lIoLFYtv1WxOz-yNJBI-oUUi3BA-pTb3/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Association of Indonesian Sociology Study Programs (APSSI)</a>, the journal is primarily aimed at researchers, academics, and social science students with a deep interest in the study of rural society dynamics and social transformation in rural areas. It publishes theoretically informed and empirically grounded scholarship on the social dynamics shaping rural communities, livelihoods, institutions, inequalities, and everyday life across diverse geographical settings.</p> <p class="isSelectedEnd">DRSJ welcomes original research articles and review articles on rural social change, including work on inequality and welfare, livelihoods and labor, migration and demographic change, rural governance, agricultural and rural development policy, public institutions, gender and family relations, community resilience, agrarian-social transformation, and conflict, identity, and citizenship in rural contexts.</p> <p>The journal particularly encourages contributions that engage with contemporary rural change in Asia, Africa, Latin America, and other developing regions, while connecting local empirical evidence to broader international debates in rural sociology, rural studies, development studies, agrarian change, and related fields.</p> <p align="justify"><strong>Dynamics of Rural Society Journal </strong>publishes manuscripts twice a year, in January and July. e-ISSN Number: <a href="https://issn.brin.go.id/terbit/detail/20230222171510723" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2987-0844</a></p> en-US sahrain@ung.ac.id (Sahrain Bumulo) dewinta@ung.ac.id (Dewinta Rizky R. Hatu) Wed, 11 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0800 OJS 3.3.0.12 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Determinants of smallholder farmers’ responsiveness to agroecological practices and principles in Ethiopia, Kenya and Madagascar https://drsj.fis.ung.ac.id/DRSJ/article/view/161 <p>Smallholder farmers across East Africa face significant challenges in fully adopting agroecological practices, despite their demonstrated benefits for soil health, biodiversity, water conservation, and farm resilience. This study examined the determinants of smallholder farmers' responsiveness to agroecological principles and practices in Ethiopia, Kenya, and Madagascar using a sample of 993 farmers. A multi-stakeholder cross-sectional survey was conducted using a detailed, structured, and expert-validated questionnaire administered to smallholder farmers, considering multidimensional variation at both the farm and system levels. Multiple regression analysis and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) were employed to explore the underlying dimensions of adoption and predictors of responsiveness. The results revealed substantial variation across countries. In Kenya, farmers implemented 12 or more principles, whereas in Madagascar and Ethiopia, adoption was moderate, with lower uptake of agroecological principles. Farmer Field Schools (FFS) influenced adoption primarily through social learning, whereby farmers collaboratively experiment, observe outcomes, and share experiences, rather than through top-down technology transfer. Regression analysis showed that knowledge co-creation, education level, agroecology-specific land use, and incentives for participation in and sharing of agroecological practices were significant predictors of responsiveness, while structural constraints played a moderating role. These findings highlight the need to prioritize extension models that are inclusive, participatory, and adaptive, linking farmer education, locally appropriate land-use strategies, and targeted incentives to overcome structural barriers and ensure agroecology delivers both ecological resilience and improved livelihoods. PCA extracted seven components—ecological practices, extension methods, social learning, institutional enhancements, experiential knowledge, adoption behaviors, and gender/culture—which explained 63.38% of the total variance. The study concludes that farmers' responsiveness to agroecological principles is shaped by a dynamic interplay of structural, behavioral, and institutional factors. Strengthening participatory extension systems, co-creation platforms, and incentive frameworks can enhance uptake. These findings provide evidence-based insights for designing context-specific interventions to accelerate agroecological transitions towards sustainable agriculture.</p> Max Olupot, Oladimeji Idowu Oladele Copyright (c) 2026 Max Olupot, Oladimeji Idowu Oladele https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 https://drsj.fis.ung.ac.id/DRSJ/article/view/161 Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0800