Navigating the promise and perils of village autonomy: Insights from Kepulauan Meranti, Indonesia

Authors

  • Robert Saputra Department of Social Geography and Regional Development, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
  • Tomáš Havlíček Department of Social Geography and Regional Development, Charles University, Prague, Czechia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37905/drsj.v3i2.82

Keywords:

Decentralization, Indonesia, Kepulauan Meranti, Rural Development, Village Autonomy

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of village autonomy on rural development in Indonesia which focuses on the implementation of Village Law No. 6/2014. The objective of this research includes: (1) analyzing the implementation of decentralization in rural Indonesia through Village Law No. 6/2014, (2) assessing the effects of village autonomy on rural development, and (3) identifying factors mediating the relationship between village autonomy and rural development. This research further uses a mixed-methods approach, including quantitative analysis and field observations. This study evaluates key variables such as resource allocation, access to services, participation, social cohesion, and economic opportunities. Results of the study indicates that village autonomy, particularly access to services and economic opportunities, significantly influences rural development. Village Law No. 6/2014 has empowered local government through increased decision-making authority, financial allocation, and community participation. However, challenges such as reliance on intergovernmental transfers, limited administrative capacity, and government inefficiencies hinder its full potential. This study identifies institutional environments and local governance practices as critical mediators, emphasizing the need for transparency, participatory planning, and capacity building. Additionally, the cash-for-work program (Padat Karya Tunai - PKT) is highlighted as a complementary strategy to enhance rural livelihoods and infrastructure. This research concludes that integrating PKT with village autonomy policies can foster inclusive and sustainable rural development. Recommendations include expanding PKT, improving governance mechanisms, and ensuring equitable resource distribution to address underdevelopment in rural Indonesia. These findings provide valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners seeking to design more effective governance frameworks and targeted interventions which support equitable growth and resilience in rural communities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agrawal, A., & Gupta, K. (2005). Decentralization and participation: The governance of common pool resources in Nepal’s Terai. World Development, 33(7), 1101–1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.04.009

Andari, R. N., & Fitria, R. (2023). Village funds policy and its impact on improvement and autonomy status of villages in Indonesia. Kne Social Sciences, 8(11), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i11.13537

Angkasa, N., & Evardi, R. (2022). Position of the Tempuran village head in the implementation of village autonomy. Constitutional Law Society, 1(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.36448/cls.v1i1.24

Arsita, S., Rezeki, F., & Setyaningrum, R. P. (2024). The influence of competence and accountability on the performance of village employees is mediated by organizational commitment in Serang Baru District, Bekasi Regency. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science, 5(5). https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v5i5.2814

Befu, H. (1974). Village autonomy and articulation with the state: The case of Tokugawa Japan. In Man in adaptation (1st ed.). Routledge.

Berki, B. M., Málovics, G., Tóth, J., & Remus, C. (2020). The role of social capital and interpersonal relations in the alleviation of extreme poverty and spatial segregation of Romani people in Szeged. Jura - Juristische Ausbildung, 9, 33. https://doi.org/10.37043/JURA.2017.9.1.2

Choi, E., Park, J., & Lee, S. (2020). The effect of the comprehensive rural village development program on farm income in South Korea. Sustainability, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176877

Das, M. (2022). Panchayati Raj institutions in India. Galore International Journal of Applied Sciences and Humanities, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.52403/gijash.20220402

Dawud, J., Ramdani, D. F., Iyoega, R. R., Miftahudin, A., Paramitha, T. P., & Widaningsih. (2023). Reactualization of local value of Sundanese in strengthening self-governing community of village government. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-104-3_9

Devi, J., & Kumar, D. (2023). Women empowerment in Panchayati Raj institutions of Himachal Pradesh. International Journal of Political Science and Governance, 5(2), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.33545/26646021.2023.v5.i2d.284

Divi, S., Dash, D. N., & Sahoo, M. K. (2024). Problems and challenges of Indian rural local governments in achieving sustainable development goals: An analysis of the viable perspectives. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 19(7), 2455–2464. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.190703

Drobnjaković, M., & Panić, M. (2024). Introduction of the approach for reviving the sub-municipal level as a spatial aspect of decentralization in Serbia. Land, 13(6), 752. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060752

Coburn, E. (2021). Sociology versus economics: Economic life as social fact and social struggle. International Sociology, 36(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/02685809211057474

Elvy, J. K. (2019). Towards socially inclusive sustainable mobility: The role of social capital in participatory transport planning processes (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Leeds, Institute for Transport Studies).

Falleti, T. G. (2004). A sequential theory of decentralization and its effects on the intergovernmental balance of power: Latin American cases in comparative perspective (Working Paper No. 314). Kellogg Institute.

Faoziyah, U., & Salim, W. (2020). Seeking prosperity through village proliferation: An evidence of the implementation of village funds (Dana Desa) in Indonesia. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 31(2), 97–121. https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2020.31.2.1

Floranza, J. M. (2021). Barangay governance in the northeast of Catanduanes, Philippines: Basis for Catanduanes State University Panganiban Campus extension program. European Journal of Social Impact and Circular Economy, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.13135/2704-9906/5058

Fronczak, A., Mrowinski, M. J., & Fronczak, P. (2022). Scientific success from the perspective of the strength of weak ties. Scientific Reports, 12, 5074. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09118-8

Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete SPSS 23 (8th ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro

Goel, R. K., Mazhar, U., Nelson, M. A., & Ram, R. (2017). Different forms of decentralization and their impact on government performance: Micro-level evidence from 113 countries. Economic Modelling, 62, 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.12.010

Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469

Hafurova, O. (2021). Legal basis of rural hospitality in the context of inclusive rural development. Law. Human. Environment, 12(2), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.31548/law2021.02.03

Hakim, M. A. (2021). Good governance in a village and the need for village autonomy in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Public Administration, 22(2), 148–170. https://doi.org/10.36609/bjpa.v22i1.181

Hakim, M. L., Agung, M. F. M., Hanif, N. A., & Firman, F. (2024). Driving village-owned enterprises (BUMDes) innovation as a driving force for independent village development through inclusive leadership. JSC, 2(2), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.61183/jsc.v2i2.49

Inah, N., Saraswati, E., & Ghofar, A. (2023). Social value of the irrigation water utilization improvement program. International Journal of Business Economics & Management, 6(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijbem.v6n2.2139

Indartuti, E., Wirawan, I. B., Handoko, V. R., & Nasution, U. C. (2020). Evaluation of village autonomy in Indonesia: An analysis study of village autonomy in Pekarungan Village, Sukodono Sub-District, Sidoarjo District. Public Policy and Administration Research, 10(6), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.7176/ppar/10-6-08

Janse, M. (2022). Voluntary associations and political participation. In S. Department of Political History, Theories and Geography, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid (Ed.), Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13520-0_10

Kadir, A., Zuada, L. H., & Idris. (2021). Village autonomy and participatory democracy in Indonesia: The problem of community participation in post-village autonomy in the Southeast Sulawesi Province. Public Policy and Administration, 20(4), 514–529. https://doi.org/10.13165/VPA-21-20-4-12

Kang, J. W., & Hong, S. W. (2023). A study on the sense of local community in residents’ self-government organizations: Focusing on residents' associations and residents' self-government committees. Forum of Public Safety and Culture, 25, 145–165. https://doi.org/10.52902/kjsc.2023.25.145

Kate, M. (2023). Impact of devolution on local governance and service delivery in Kenya. International Journal of Humanity and Social Sciences, 1(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijhss.1431

Kementerian Desa, Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal, dan Transmigrasi. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Desa, Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal, dan Transmigrasi Nomor 2 Tahun 2016 tentang Indeks Desa Membangun. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/150585/permendes-pdtt-no-2-tahun-2016

Kushandajani, K. (2017). Implikasi UU No. 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa terhadap penyelenggaraan pemerintahan desa. JIIP Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 2(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.14710/jiip.v2i1.1635

Liao, B., & Shen, M. (2023). Can centralized intervention solve rural credit exclusion? Evidence from China. Atlantis Highlights in Computer Sciences. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-198-2_142

Liu, W., Li, J. J. T., & Chen, J. (2024). Voting participation in grassroots elections and rural residents’ subjective well-being in China: The mediation roles of social class and fairness. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 24(3), 1189–1207. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12411

Liu, Y., Wang, L., & Ye, M. (2022). Public participation in democracy, local accountability and happiness: Evidence from rural China. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 36(4), 1225–1245. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12738

Mgonja, R., & Massawe, P. (2024). The role of community-based initiatives in enhancing water quality and livelihoods in rural Tanzania: A case study of Mvomero District. NG Journal of Social Development, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.4314/ngjsd.v15i1.1

Muriisa, R. K. (2021). Decentralisation in Uganda: Prospects for improved service delivery. Africa Development, 33(4). https://doi.org/10.4314/ad.v33i4.57344

Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (6th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Okuda, Y. (2023). Enhancement of rural agriculture in Japan through industry-academia collaboration: A case of cloud ear mushroom production in Tottori Prefecture. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1232830

Phahlevy, R. R. (2016). The concept of village autonomy in Indonesia (Indonesian constitution perspective). Rechtsidee, 3(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v3i1.151

Pratolo, S., Atmaja, N. R. S., & Sofyani, H. (2020). What determines village autonomy in Indonesia? A case of villages in Sleman Regency. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 7(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdab.v7i1.15086

Prayitno, G., Hayat, A., Efendi, A., Tarno, H., Fikriyah, & Fauziah, S. H. (2022). Structural model of social capital and quality of life of farmers in supporting sustainable agriculture (Evidence: Sedayulawas Village, Lamongan Regency-Indonesia). MDPI, 14(19), 12487. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912487

Purnomo, S., Rahayu, E. S., Riani, A. L., Suminah, S., & Udin, U. (2020). Empowerment model for sustainable tourism village in an emerging country. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(2), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no2.261

Putra, D. A., & Alifandi, M. A. (2021). Legal study of the existence of genuine autonomy in order to organize village autonomy in Indonesia. Negrei Academic Journal of Law and Governance, 1(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.29240/negrei.v1i1.2623

Putri, A. R. D., Saputri, S. R., & Manurung, H. (2023). Implementation of village autonomy policy based on Law Number 6 of 2014. Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Business (Jhssb), 2(3), 482–492. https://doi.org/10.55047/jhssb.v2i3.650

Ren, H., Yang, F., Zhang, J., & Wang, Q. (2024). Evaluation of cognition of rural public space based on eye tracking analysis. Buildings, 14(6), 1525. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061525

Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Ezcurra, R. (2010). Does decentralization matter for regional disparities? A cross-country analysis. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(5), 619–644. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbp049

Rozaki, A. (2022). From political clientelism to participatory democracy. Engagement: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.29062/engagement.v6i1.1185

Rudiarta, I. K. G., Arthanaya, I. W., & Suryani, L. P. (2020). Pengelolaan alokasi dana desa dalam pemerintahan desa. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 2(2), 63–67. https://ejournal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/analogihukum/article/view/1619

Sambas, M., & Saputro, G. E. (2024). Village fund management on the improvement of community economy. International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 3(6), 2962–2968. https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i6.981

Setiawan, R., & Melinda, E. (2020). Optimization of the implementation of village government in Indonesia. RUDN Journal of Public Administration, 7(4), 352–360. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8313-2020-7-4-352-360

Shangarai, J. A., Njoroge, D. J., & Moi, D. E. J. (2023). Public accountability practice and devolved administrative structures in selected semi-arid counties in Kenya. American Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 8(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajppa.1327

Somanje, A. N., Mohan, G., Lopes, J., Mensah, A., Gordon, C., Zhou, X., Moinuddin, M., Saito, O., & Takeuchi, K. (2020). Challenges and potential solutions for sustainable urban-rural linkages in a Ghanaian context. Sustainability, 12(2), 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020507

Sujito, A., & Ghofur, M. (2023). The nurturing food sovereignty from the peripheral side: The village law and the soul of agriculture in rural development in Indonesia. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 10(03), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.22500/10202243672

Sutisna, A., & Qibthiyyah, R. M. (2023). The impact of village cash transfer on rural households’ economic well-being. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 7(2), 288–298. https://doi.org/10.36574/jpp.v7i2.459

Sutiyo, S., & Maharjan, K. L. (2017). Decentralization and rural development in Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3208-0

Tang, P., Chen, J., Gao, J., Li, M., & Wang, J. (2020). What role(s) do village committees play in the withdrawal from rural homesteads? Evidence from Sichuan province in Western China. Land, 9(12), 477. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9120477

Tešin, A., Dragin, A. S., Mijatov Ladičorbić, M., Jovanović, T., Zadel, Z., Surla, T., Košić, K., Amezcua-Ogáyar, J. M., Calahorro-López, A., Kuzman, B., & Stojanović, V. (2024). Quality of life and attachments to rural settlements: The basis for regeneration and socio-economic sustainability. Land, 13(9), 1364. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091364

Timotius, R. (2018). Revitalisasi desa dalam konteks desentralisasi menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 4(2), 323–344. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1241&context=jhp

Turok, I., & Scheba, A. (2020). Grassroots democracy and development: Learning from the Philippines. Local Economy, 35(3), 179-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094220917062

Udanga, G. E., & Cuevas, A. (2023). Assessing government service delivery in Barangay Pili, Mogpog, Marinduque: A resident satisfaction survey. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 7(3), 341–359. https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2023.v03i07.025

Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/38582/uu-no-6-tahun-2014

Wahyudi, A., Sartika, D., Wismono, F. H., Ramdhani, L. E., Rosliana, L., Kusumaningrum, M., & Zakiyah, S. (2020). Investigating organizational and human resource capacity of village government: A case study in Kutai Kartanegara Regency. Policy & Governance Review, 4(2), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v4i2.267

Wang, R., Eisenack, K., & Tan, R. (2019). Sustainable rural renewal in China: Archetypical patterns. Ecology and Society, 24(3), 32. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11069-240332

Wotango, T. D., & Somano, T. T. (2021). Active political participation of citizens and its impact on building democratic government system: The case of Wolaita Zone. Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 4(4), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jpsir.20210404.11

Wu, L., Rogers, B., & Wang, G. (2022). Explaining voting participation gaps in local government elections in rural China. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 8(1), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911221125510

Yamani, M., & Andika, T. (2024). Revitalization of village autonomy based on the principle of subsidiarity and village-scale local authority in natural resource management. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i1.3102

Ydyrys, S., Ibrayeva, N., Abugalieva, F., Zhaskairat, M., & Uvaliyeva, A. (2023). Regulatory and legal support for the development of digital infrastructure in rural areas as a factor in improving the level of sustainable development and quality of life of the rural population. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 14(5), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v14.5(69).08

Yuniza, M. E., Jibril, M., & Nashih, F. M. (2020). Village fund as poverty countermeasures in Indonesia: Case study of village expenditure in Central Java. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 8(3), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.8312

Zhou, J., & Yang, F. (2023). Impact of Chinese-style fiscal decentralization on urban–rural integration: Based on factor allocation. Sustainability, 15(2), 1542. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021542

Zuliyah, S. (2020). Policy to develop independent village government in regional autonomy design in Indonesia. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(7), 16360–16371. https://docslib.org/doc/8027014/policy-to-develop-independent-village-government-in-regional-autonomy-design-in-pjaee-17-7-2020-indonesia

Downloads

Published

2025-05-05

How to Cite

Saputra, R., & Tomáš Havlíček. (2025). Navigating the promise and perils of village autonomy: Insights from Kepulauan Meranti, Indonesia. Dynamics of Rural Society Journal, 3(2, July), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.37905/drsj.v3i2.82